Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should infection control practitioners do follow-up of staff exposures to patient blood and body fluids?

0
Posted

Should infection control practitioners do follow-up of staff exposures to patient blood and body fluids?

0

GROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficiency of a joint infection control/occupational health program for the follow-up of accidental blood or bloody body fluid exposures in health care workers. METHODS: A comprehensive staff follow-up program for all blood exposures with known patient sources was initiated in 1989, consisting of patient follow-up by the Infection Control Department (risk assessment for hepatitis B virus [HBV] and [HIV] infection and obtaining of consent for HIV testing) and staff follow-up by the Occupational Health Department. In 1992 a mailed survey was conducted to examine exposure follow-up policies and responsibilities in large teaching hospitals across Canada. RESULTS: A total of 924 blood exposures with known patient sources were reported between January 1989 and December 1993. HIV and HBV screening was obtained for 67.9% and 87.6% of patients assessed as at low risk and 82.3% and 92.2% of those assessed as at high risk for infection, respe

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.