Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should taxpayers fund anti-drug commercials during the Super Bowl?

0
Posted

Should taxpayers fund anti-drug commercials during the Super Bowl?

0

I think they provided a great deal of public debate. It appears to be successful. Congress designated $192 million dollars toward the anti-drug education campaign. It’s a worthwhile investment, teaching and encouraging parents to talk to young people about the issue of drugs and responsibility. That campaign has been very, very beneficial. Part of that was the $10 million purchase on the Super Bowl, making the connection between drugs and terrorism. It’s had a tremendous response. That was well spent because it’s being followed up on with additional commercials in prime time. If it causes parents to talk to young people about their problems with drugs, then it’s money well spent. Q: What lessons has the DEA learned from the war on terrorism? A: There are numerous connections and correlations between our efforts against terrorism and our efforts against drugs. They’re both long struggles. Terrorism didn’t start with the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. In 1950, Puerto Rican natio

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.