Should the level of project evaluation differ between Priority 1 and Priority 2 applications?
Yes. Priority 1 projects, which are designed as proof-of-concept, should emphasize needs assessments, feasibility studies and formative evaluation to help shape future implementation at larger scales. Priority 2 projects, which are designed for current implementation at a wide scale, should include both a formative and summative evaluation.
Related Questions
- Can the evaluation of Striving Readers interventions randomly assign at the school level or must the project randomly assign students?
- For a projects proposed to priority 2, should an external evaluator be utilized for project evaluation?
- In the Project Narrative, Evaluation section, how do item B3.1 and B3.2 differ?