Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should US attorney Johnny Sutton be forced to testify in the case of Ramos and Compean?

0
Posted

Should US attorney Johnny Sutton be forced to testify in the case of Ramos and Compean?

0

The rule of law and the rights of the people have been under continuous assault in recent years. Nowhere has the rule of law been so grievously abused as the prosecution, trial and conviction of Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Compean. These two well-respected and highly decorated Border patrol agents fired their weapons at a drug trafficking suspect in the course of their duties. When we issue weapons to policing agencies, we reasonable expect they may have reason to use them at some point, even if for self-defense. And that is exactly what Ramos and Compean tell us they were doing. The story of that incident and the resulting inadequacies of the trial that followed have resulted in these fine officers being sentenced to more than ten years in prison. There is much dispute in the actual facts of the case: what is clear is US Attorney Johnny Sutton withheld evidence that likely would have resulted in a very different verdict. Among facts which leave much doubt is the chain of evidence f

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.