Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Some people claim that higher frequencies than the current 3.92 Hz is more effective, or that non-square waves are more desirable. Whats the scoop?

0
Posted

Some people claim that higher frequencies than the current 3.92 Hz is more effective, or that non-square waves are more desirable. Whats the scoop?

0

This is our opinion on the subject: There may be validity in using different frequencies or even outputting non-square waves. However, we know absolutely that the 3.92 Hz and square-wave (1/2 earth frequency of 7.83 Hz) output does work, and that it is very effective. More detailed research must be carried out before altering the protocol. This is an open field for research and scientific study. It is very easy to alter the frequency and/or output waveform. The altering of the output may actually remove the very mechanism by which this protocol works. We suggest adhering to the present “tried and tested “protocol until new evidence surfaces suggesting an alternative.

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.