The guidance does not mention the possibility of the childs permanent exclusion being refuted and if this happens, should the child therefore be included in part B of the indicator?
If the permanent exclusion is refuted, it should then be counted as a fixed term exclusion in part b of the indicator. SCC/024 Effective planning for education Q: Please could it be clarified that children who are discharged from care before their PEP is due should not be included in this indicator. A: A child who has not received a PEP will not be recorded in the Numerator of SCC/024 as this looks specifically at ‘the number of times children looked after during the year had a Personal Education Plan within 20 school days of entering care. However, they should be included in the Denominator as this records ‘the number of times a child enters care during the year’ regardless of whether the child has had a PEP or not. Q: We need clarification specifically relating to circumstances where a child becomes looked after and then moves school within the 20 school days. Does this require the preparation of two separate PEPs. (one for the bla event and one for the school move), or would a PEP p
Related Questions
- The guidance does not mention the possibility of the childs permanent exclusion being refuted and if this happens, should the child therefore be included in part B of the indicator?
- Should days missed due to permanent exclusion which were subsequently overturned be included as fixed exclusion days?
- What happens when there is disagreement between a child and his/her parents about research participation?
