The same dynamic picture can produce thousand of “screenshots” without any efforts from the artist. Does this bring down the status quo and creativity of traditional artists?
Before the development of photography artists spent many patient hours struggling to copy and perfect still images. In the 19th century a mechanical device was created which did the same thing. In what measure did the occurrence of a photo discredit painters? There certainly were some problems with this, but now photography has become an independent type of art and there are no conflicts between the two. At any moment the dynamic picture can be stopped and transformed into a static one. It is then possible to print the image on canvas with very high resolution. This print will be unique as precisely the same image will never be repeated in the original dynamic picture. This process is very similar to photography where it is necessary to find (and wait for) an interesting moment which you then capture. It does not demand a lot of effort but patience and good taste are required. It is necessary to understand that the dynamic picture does not create at all times absolutely different image
Related Questions
- What is the status of the Government’s efforts to clean up the industrial contamination of the upper Calcesieu Lake estuary of southwestern Louisiana?
- Why did Helios Biosciences choose the T-lymphocyte response to bring its dynamic modeling proof of principle?
- WHY THE COMBINATION OF WORDS AND VISUALS? ISN’T A PICTURE WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS?
