Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

The shank of the XYZ Ω seems awfully short compared to other anchors. Why is that?

anchors awfully shank short XYZ
0
Posted

The shank of the XYZ Ω seems awfully short compared to other anchors. Why is that?

0

A long shank is easier to bend or even break. A short shank is much stronger. The best shank is short, strong, as thin as possible consistent with strength, and sharp on both the bottom and top edges. Sharp edges allow the shank to cut through the bottom surface, not restricting the anchor’s ability to bury deeply. All existing anchors have long shanks simply because their design does not allow them to be shorter. And, anchor elements such as: FRONT BALLAST, ROTATING ROLL-BARS, and other elements found on most anchors make up a significant part of the weight but add NOTHING to holding power. Even worse, they can significantly restrict the anchor from penetrating deep into the seabed. The XYZ Ω was designed from the beginning to have a short, relatively thin shank with sharpened edges. It is strong, and does not restrict digging depth.

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.