|
No. The employee is only entitled to an “effective” accommodation and not the accommodation of choice. If there are two possible reasonable accommodations, and one costs more or is more burdensome than the other, the employer may choose the less expensive or burdensome accommodation as long as it is effective (i.e., it would remove a workplace barrier, thereby providing the individual with an equal opportunity to apply for a position, to perform the essential functions of a position, or to gain equal access to a benefit or privilege of employment). Similarly, when there are two or more effective accommodations, the employer may choose the one that is easier to provide. In either situation, the employer does not have to show that it is an undue hardship to provide the more expensive or more difficult accommodation. If more than one accommodation is effective, the “preference of the individual with a disability should be given primary consideration. However, the employer providing the ...
more
|
Under the Reasonable Accommodations Process, is the disabled employee entitled to anything that he/she wants?
Related Questions
- The ADA's prohibition on assessing the positive effects of mitigating measures applies only to the ...
- There is substantial authority that a practitioner may charge his or her client a premium in excess of what ...
- When a lawyer bills the client for the cost of outsourced legal support services as a direct expense (or ...
- Since the retroreflective properties of traffic control devices deteriorate over time, highway officials ...
- Anything tangible that makes it impossible or difficult to use your service. Once service providers identify ...