Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was it morally right to bomb HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI to complete destruction?

0
Posted

Was it morally right to bomb HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI to complete destruction?

0

This ones father served in the Marine Corp during WW II and would have been one of those sent to invade the island nation of Nippon/Japan, should that nation have decided not to surrender unconditionally after the two mentioned bombings. After the surrender, it was learned from civilian accounts as well as captured documents that the people of Nippon/Japan were prepared to fight to the death of every man woman and child on the island if their emperor, His Royal Highness Hirohito, had so ordered them to. The ensuing death toll would literally have been unimaginable to both the Nipponese/Japanese as well as to the allied forces that would have carried out the invasion. The realization of such must be weighed carefully against the horrors and destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as by the aftermath and effects of the radiation poisoning that followed. How many person who have been born and lived since would not have been as their fathers and mothers would not have been? The othe

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.