0
Q:

Was the Meeting of the Estates General a step towards or backwards for democracy?

Add your answer...

1 Answer

0
Only a modernist would describe it in such linear terms. It was neither forward nor backward. It was a shift. It displaced or removed certain power relations, but only to put up new ones. It, like the US Constitution of 1789, spoke from a position of various "freedoms" based on a public-private dichotomy, but this dichotomy only existed through the State and it only benefited those whom the State represented. Thus, it was only democratic for the bourgeoisie and, to a lesser extent, the remaining aristocracy. As a "step toward" global capital and its codification in the State, it was a huge step backward for the non-European world that would be colonized over the next two centuries. more
answers.yahoo.com
Thanks for your feedback!

Related Videos

Not the answer you're looking for? Try asking your own question.

...