Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Were Dubyas Inane Responses Presidential Or Deliberately Engineered Non Sequitors?

0
Posted

Were Dubyas Inane Responses Presidential Or Deliberately Engineered Non Sequitors?

0

The startling facts which have recently surfaced in our nation’s capitol about Dubya’s dilatory response to clear and concise information received from federal-disaster officials, concerning the imminent danger that Hurricane Katrina posed to thousands of New Orleans’ residents, makes me wonder if the severely lame duck President knew anything in advance about 9/11. It’s certainly ironic that a few astute historians, such as Georgetown University’s renown Dr. Charles Tansill and the writer John Toland, tend to agree that, fifty-five years ago, FDR knew well in advance about the Japanese surprise attack at Pearl Harbor, but deliberately ordered that the U.S. Naval Command at Pearl not be warned. Why? According to sensitive classified War Department documents, made unavailable during the mid-1940s to (or hidden from) the Congressional Blue Ribbon Commission that investigated the Pearl Harbor debacle, Roosevelt had secretly negotiated a pact with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill,

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.