|
An assessment or examination procedure which unreasonably disadvantages students with a disability relative to students who do not have that disability will constitute indirect discrimination under the DDA. Adjustments to avoid or remedy this disadvantage will be required by the DDA except where this is unreasonable (or where the unjustifiable hardship exception applies).There is little clear guidance from case law to date on what is reasonable and what unjustifiable hardship involves in this area. However, a number of points of advice can be given. • An adjustment method which confers an unfair advantage on a student in competitive processes is not required in the Commission's view. Giving a student extra time, deferred examination or some assistance such as an interpreter or amanuensis should not in itself be assumed to confer an unfair advantage. The Commission acknowledges that decisions in this area may involve difficult judgments. In the event of a complaint, education ...
more
|
What adjustments in exams and assessment procedures are required by the DDA?
Related Questions
- The DDA does not require education providers to make changes to courses which would undermine the academic ...
- Section 28 of the Disability Discrimination Act makes it unlawful to exclude a person from a sporting ...
- The Disability Discrimination Act and the Disability Standards for Education made under the Act do not ...
- Concerns arise in this area when the groups selected as priority targets are narrower than the range of ...
- The specific harassment provisions of the DDA in relation to education - sections 37 and 38 - prohibit ...