What are the different options for administering the MBTI with a group? What are the advantages and downsides of each?
The MBTI assessment is a restricted psychological tool, so you need certification training to administer most forms of it with others. Once certified, you have lots of options for administration, both paper and computer-based. Open OKA’s MBTI Administration Fact Sheet for an overview of the most popular MBTI Form M administration methods, with their pros and cons. I am encountering a similar situation in two separate teams: In each team, the leader shows very clear ISTJ behaviors, but reports ENTJ on the Indicator. Even when we discuss “best fit” type, they still think they are ENTJs. This is very confusing to their teams. Any suggestions in working with these leaders or teams? Your question is great and complex. At what point does a manager/leader stop reflecting his/her own preferences and start exhibiting the organization’s qualities and expectations? It is very hard to say. All good NTs have a competency check-list against which excellence is measured. What happens when the NT comp
