What are the particular effects of the post-structuralist feminism?
• women are already on the margins of society, and so it somehow makes sense for feminists to read philosophy from a marginal, subversive perspective; • women who write in a style which is subversive of traditionally masculine discourse (philosophy) can be seen in a sense to do so more genuinely, or authentically, than men. For instance, Derridas claim to write in the hand of a woman (Spurs) seems to some feminists simply to be yet another masculine appropriation of the feminine. However… • Many feminists are uncomfortable with being identified with that which is resisted, or repressed, by traditional discourse. Ideas about women could again collapse into the hysterical women, or the seductress, with no control over her writing • Many feminists criticize the tendency in post-modern, or post-structuralist, feminism to destabilize the ontological notion woman, or a shared identity in terms of which feminism, as a political movement, defines itself. One might ask: what is the basis for
Related Questions
- Charter schools by definition are autonomous institutions. Why then do charter schools have to submit the Language Census and why do they have to submit it in conjunction with a particular LEA?
- How do I determine if graduate credit is available for a particular course?
- What are the particular effects of the post-structuralist feminism?
