|
It is impossible to go into great detail in this FAQ, but I strongly urge the interested reader to consult Bones of Contention by Marvin L. Lubenow which thoroughly examines the human evolution controversy and demonstrates its conclusion -- that the fossil evidence is so contrary to human evolution as to effectively falsify the idea that humans evolved. The fossil known as KP 271 (the distal end of a humerus found in 1965 by Bryan Patterson of Harvard University in an excellent state of preservation) has been given by evolutionists a date of 4.5 million years ago, thus it becomes virtually the oldest hominid fossil ever found -- older than Lucy and all of the australopithecines. Much to the evolutionist's surprise, this oldest respectable hominid fossil ever found, representing a part of the anatomy where it is relatively easy to discriminate between humans and the other primates -- both living and fossil, is virtually identical to that of Homo sapiens (modern humans). This suggests ...
|
What does the fossil record tell us about human evolution?
Related Questions
- While we affirm that God is the Creator and that we are His children, even His offspring (Acts 17:28,29), the ...
- Nope. Rather than evidence for evolution (in the fossil record), we basically have "ingenious excuses"[1] ...
- The reason is simple enough. They were all washed into place by the worldwide Flood. The water tended to sort ...
- Nope. Evolution is a collection of speculations (conjectures) regarding how species might have arisen. The ...
- When we have a group of living organisms that is differentiated from its nearest relatives by a whole suite ...