Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What exactly makes a person a good philosopher, their credentials, or the way they argue philosophical topics?

0
Posted

What exactly makes a person a good philosopher, their credentials, or the way they argue philosophical topics?

0

It’s more than just argument that makes a good philosopher. Salesmen and politicians can argue well, but that doesn’t make them good philosophers. And credentials clearly don’t matter to the quality of your philosophy – though they may affect who’s willing to listen to you. Ancient Greek philosophers had (and *could* have) no credentials, because they were starting from scratch. I think that a good philosopher needs at minimum: * The ability to observe * The ability to reason * Some sense of what the important questions are * Some felicity with language My justification is as follows: * If you can’t observe then you can’t validate or support your arguments * If you can’t reason then your arguments will be flawed * If you don’t know what the important questions are then your arguments may be valid, but nobody will heed them * If you don’t have some felicity with language then your meaning will be murky, and people will get bored On the other hand, if you have all these facilities then y

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.