What Happens if the Executive Officer Concludes that Insufficient Evidence Exists to Support a Finding of Retaliation?
In those instances where the Executive Officer concludes in the Notice of Findings that insufficient evidence has been presented to establish that the complaining party has been retaliated against for having engaged in protected activity under the WPA, the complaint will be dismissed by the Executive Officer. The complaining party will be deemed to have exhausted his or her administrative remedies, and may thereafter pursue whatever judicial remedies are available to him or her under the WPA.
Related Questions
- What Happens if the Executive Officer Concludes that Insufficient Evidence Exists to Support a Finding of Retaliation?
- What Happens if the Executive Officer Concludes that Sufficient Evidence Exists to Support a Finding of Retaliation?
- What happens when a proposal is not approved by the Food Service Review Committee and my Executive Officer?