Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What has been the response of the Evolutionary Establishment to Behes evidence (for irreducible complexity)?

0
Posted

What has been the response of the Evolutionary Establishment to Behes evidence (for irreducible complexity)?

0

The responses have been basically irrational. “Behe does not understand science.” (IOW, Science = Atheism. And if Behe doesnt recognize this, Behe is a bad man and we shouldn’t listen to him. 🙂 “Behe has a religious agenda” (IOW, Behe believes in God, and so that makes him automatically mentally incompetent and so we shouldnt listen to him. 🙂 “Behe suffers from a failure of the imagination.” (IOW, Behe subscribes to the concept that experimental validation is a good way to do science. And because he does not use the Darwinian method of just imagining a series of intermediates and being content to accept that rather than looking for experimental validation, Behe is a bad man and we should not listen to him. 🙂 Atheist Evolutionary Zoologist Richard Dawkins (Oxford University) denounced Behe as cowardly for believing in God, but admitted that he could not answer Behe’s argument.

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.