Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What If I File A Properly Supported Motion For Summary Judgment And The Other Party Doesn’t File Properly Supported Opposition Papers?

0
Posted

What If I File A Properly Supported Motion For Summary Judgment And The Other Party Doesn’t File Properly Supported Opposition Papers?

0

If a motion for summary judgment is properly supported, the burden rests on the respondent to show why the motion should not be granted. Unless the respondent can do more than simply create some doubt as to the material facts presented by the moving party, the court should grant the summary judgment motion. The Court should not ignore the respondent’s burden to come forward with evidence showing more than mere doubt that the crucial facts of the case support the granting of the summary judgment motion. Even if the respondent merely presents legal arguments to deny summary judgment, those arguments, if unsupported by proof of material facts, should fail to save the respondent from having the summary judgment motion decided against the respondent. For example, if a respondent offers no affidavits, certifications or other proofs in opposition to the summary judgment motion, the court may accept as true the evidence submitted by the moving party. However, even where the nonmoving party fai

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.