|
According to its proponents, Dada was not art — it was "anti-art." Dada sought to fight art with art. For everything that art stood for, Dada was to represent the opposite. Where art was concerned with aesthetics, Dada ignored aesthetics. If art were to have at least an implicit or latent message, Dada strove to have no meaning — interpretation of Dada is dependent entirely on the viewer. If art is to appeal to sensibilities, Dada is to offend. It is perhaps then ironic that Dada became an influential movement in modern art. Dada became a commentary on order and the carnage they believed it wreaked. Through this rejection of traditional culture and aesthetics the artists associated with the movement hoped to destroy traditional culture and aesthetics. According to Tristan Tzara, "God and my toothbrush are Dada, and New Yorkers can be Dada too, if they are not already." A reviewer from the American Art News stated that "The Dada philosophy is the sickest, most paralyzing and most ...
more
|
What is Dada?
Related Questions
- The following definitions would generally apply to these terms in the jewelry trade: Georgian: Referring to ...
- Abstract Art is a tern used to describe paintings/sculptures that abandon the traditional European concept of ...
- Bauhaus (bou`hous), school of art and architecture in Germany. The Bauhaus revolutionized art training by ...
- Aubrey Beardsley (1872-1898) was an English artist and writer of the Victorian period. His distinctive Art ...
- The song Abstract Art is on The New Reign, the debut full-length album by progressive deathcore band Born of ...