What is the difference between NRT approach and ABR approach?
NRT Strategy: addressing the respiratory system: “Diaphragm” ABR Strategy: the Cascade effect from the upper airways Today I maintain that the most efficient way of addressing the respiratory system is from “top to bottom” — starting from the upper airways (frontal and nasal sinuses, mouth floor, pharynx, trachea — head and neck level) rather then focusing specifically on the diaphragm level (lower thoracic level). I obviously did not arrive to these ideas of addressing the head and neck as a primary level and the strategy of this particular cascade effect in a respiratory system overnight. Any textbook on respiration informs you that the diaphragm and intercostals are the leading respiratory muscles, therefore as early as in 1990s, when I worked with my father and later when I came to UK — the level of diaphragm has been my main focus of applications. This strategy has been successful to a great extent, however, after some time I started to see the limitations of such a strategy, w
