What is the potential role of iron oxide adsorption as municipalities continue to evaluate treatment technologies in their efforts to meet the January 2006 deadline?
Adsorption, especially technologies using iron oxide media, will continue to be at the forefront of arsenic treatment options that a municipality evaluates in its efforts to comply with the 10 ppb arsenic MCL. Adsorption technology is proven across varying water quality conditions and offers a treatment solution that is simple and cost effective. This isn’t to say that under certain, difficult water quality conditions, that a competitive technology wouldn’t be more beneficial, it’s just to say that adsorption will be able to treat the majority of arsenic contamination problems in the U.S.
Related Questions
- What is the potential role of iron oxide adsorption as municipalities continue to evaluate treatment technologies in their efforts to meet the January 2006 deadline?
- If I sustain a loss on last day of the policy and continue treatment in abroad will the policy be extended to cover the loss? If yes, what will be the charges?
- What are the water quality parameters that need to be known before employing an iron oxide adsorption treatment solution?
