What is the Signal Regiment’s role in the newly released Army doctrine on electronic warfare?
The Signal Center has been intimately involved in the work that led to the establishment of an EW career field and FM 3-36 Electronic Warfare Operations and Joint Publication 3-13.1 Electronic Warfare. While related, there are two very distinct roles for EW soldiers and signal soldiers responsible for EMSO. EW focuses on enemy operations, while EMSO focuses on supporting friendly operations and preventing frequency fratricide. Simply, the Army looks at EW as a weapon system that needs to be treated like other weapon systems. Doctrine recognizes the requirement for electronic warfare planners to coordinate directly with the communications/network planners [S6/G6/J6] during the planning stage, as they have a critical role in the electronic protect portion of EW as outlined in FM 3-0. And again, one of our Signal Regiment core competencies is EMSO. Q: What is the Signal Regiment’s role in the newly released Army doctrine on knowledge management? A: The Army published two new doctrinal man
Related Questions
- Could Career Risks Outweigh Benefits for Competitive Intelligence Technology Users, newly released survey speculates?
- How the heck am I supposed to stop an airstrike with electronic warfare for the "Air Defense" achievement?
- Do the newly released tapes of former President Richard Nixon further damage his legacy?
