Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the { SYN, ACK, FIN, RST } bit?

ack bit FIN RST Syn
0
Posted

What is the { SYN, ACK, FIN, RST } bit?

0

See the FAQ article Debugging TCP/IP. 4.13 – Is it a bad idea to bind() to a particular port in a client program? It’s occasionally justifiable, but most of the time it’s a very bad idea. I’ve only heard of two good uses of this feature. The first is when your program needs to bind to a port in a particular range. Some implementations of the Berkeley “r commands” (e.g. rlogin, rsh, rcp, etc.) do this for security purposes. Because only the superuser on a Unix system can bind to a low-numbered port (1-1023), such an r command tries, sequentially, to bind to one of the ports in this range until it succeeds. This allows the remote server to surmise that if the connection is coming from a low-numbered port, the remote user must be a superuser. (This port range limit also applies on Windows NT derivatives, but not on Windows 95 derivatives.) The second justifiable example is FTP in its “active” mode: the client binds to a random port and then tells the server to connect to that port for the

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.