Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is wrong with redefining short commands, like L or AA?

commands Redefining short wrong
0
Posted

What is wrong with redefining short commands, like L or AA?

0

• Such redefinitions preclude the use of the original meaning in, for example, the name of an author in a bibliography, possibly requiring input changes if this isn’t discovered until text input is well underway. • The most serious side effects occur when such commands are redefined in a job that also requests \usepackage{hyperref}. • If the redefinition includes math commands, in particular a special math font, a spurious error may be reported at every element that is hyperlinked, e.g. ! LaTeX Error: \xxx allowed only in math mode. • This prevents the LaTeX run from completing error-free. • It also obscures genuine errors in the job log, with the result that errors could be preserved in the final output. • When the document is an article to be published in an AMS journal, there are additional considerations: • All AMS journals are hyperlinked for on-line posting. • Automated production procedures require error-free LaTeX compilation. • The article top matter and bibliography are trans

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.