The symbol indicates that this is a Revenue Share question. You can earn money for charity by answering it now! This month we are donating Revenue Share Answer Revenues to the American Red Cross.
  1. Become an Experts123 Paid Contributor.
  2. Answer this question accurately and thoroughly.
  3. Earn revenue while your answer is ranked #1!
×
Q:

What kind of equipment does the photographer use and does it really make a difference?

2
Like
Answer
Comment
Flag
Thanks for your feedback!
A:

2 Answers

rank
1
2
Like
Comment
Flag
Yes!!! It has always been recognized that one of the signs of a true professional wedding photographer is the equipment that he or she uses. Medium format equipment has always been the recognized "standard" of professional wedding photographers. Simply put, the larger the negative, the better the resulting images. Photographers using such equipment have made a commitment to their craft and to their brides! Frankly, 35mm equipment, is not recognized as the "professional wedding format." Additionally, digital capture is now a reality. Professional level digital equipment (costing the photographer thousands of dollars) is capable of outstanding images. Digital is now the new standard for wedding photographers. Click here for a chart explaining the different formats.  more
fantasy-images.com

Related Videos

rank
2
Like
Comment
Flag

I couldn't disagree more with the previous reply.

Yes, equipment matters, but only insofar as it is a) used in the right situation for which it is designed and b) being used by a skilled photographer.

For weddings, where a lot of action takes place very quickly (some of which is unrepeatable), the camera has to be able to focus and shoot quickly. For this, DSLRs (the digital equivalent of 35mm) are ideal, because they have fast autofocus and often work well in low light.

The larger formats, such as medium format cameras, *do* produce higher resolution images, but they are slower to use.

Many professional wedding photographers still shoot film. One reason for this is that with digital, it is hard to capture a full range of highlights and shadows. The reasons for this are quite technical, but in short, if you imagine taking a shot of a bride in a white dress and a groom in a grey suit, very often the whites of the dress will ''blow out'' to pure, detail-less white, and/or the groom's suit will look grey. Film is much better at capturing a wide dynamic range (range of highlights and shadows).

So in summary, professionals choose the tool which suits the job, as well as their own personal preferences and the needs of the client.

In other areas of photography the same applies. Terry Richardson, a famous fashion photographer, shoots a lot of his work with cheap point-and-shoot cameras. I have shot assignments with plastic toy cameras and also expensive Hasselblad medium format equipment. It just depends on what is required.

Finally, if you are thinking of learning photography, don't, whatever you do, be tempted to blow huge amounts of money on expensive gear in the beginning. The differences, for most people, between an entry level camera and a top-of-the-range model are minimal. Pro cameras tend to just be a little better designed, faster, and offer higher resolution. But you pay a heavy premium for this, which may not be worthwhile unless you are earning money from photography.

I hope this helps.

-Tom

Tom Hayton · answered over a year ago

Add your answer...

Top Answerers

1.
vanity fair
7 Answers in the past week
2.
Robert Turner
4 Answers in the past week
3.
jacob kind
3 Answers in the past week

Top Askers

1.
Deitty smith
3 Questions in the past week
2.
Charles McAtee
2 Questions in the past week
3.
Frank Bell
2 Questions in the past week

Top Supporters

1.
Tom Wagner
9 Likes given in the past week
2.
Nancy Hayden
2 Likes given in the past week
3.
Rachel Kellen Gill
3 Likes given in the past week
...