Whats the verdict on the Loch Ness monster?
Dear Straight Dope: I can’t count how many shows and specials relating to the Loch Ness monster I’ve seen on The Discovery Channel, The Learning Channel, and old In Search Of . . . episodes. Scientists have spent large amounts of money, and employed elaborate equipment in attempts to put this mystery to rest. Yet, in spite of all their failed attempts at locating the beast, many people swear to their death that the driftwood and trailing boat wakes they see are indeed the prehistoric beast. So, what’s the “official” word these days? Are there any reputable scientists who actually believe in its existence? Thanks for your insight. — J.A.H. Well, Mr./Ms. H. (can I just call you “J.”?), these days one of the prerequisites for being a “reputable scientist” is that you don’t believe in the Loch Ness monster. Scientists rely on evidence, and there isn’t any for Nessie, even after all of the attempts you mention. Many paranormalists like the saying, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of abs
