Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When I subtract a Tiny Tim model from an observed WFPC2 PSF, there are large residuals in the diffraction spikes. What can be done?

0
Posted

When I subtract a Tiny Tim model from an observed WFPC2 PSF, there are large residuals in the diffraction spikes. What can be done?

0

The diffraction spikes consist of alternating bright and dark bands extending out from the star. The positions and intensities of these bands are extremely sensitive to a number of factors, including the position of the star, the focus of the telescope, the object color, etc. The diffraction spikes in Tiny Tim models are poor matches to the observed ones. Observed PSFs have the same problem. Thus, there is no way to get around this problem. You should never use the spiders to normalize a PSF when subtracting, whether it is an observed or model PSF.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.