Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When should I use a research-tested intervention program rather then developing my own?

0
Posted

When should I use a research-tested intervention program rather then developing my own?

0

RTIPs-listed programs have been shown to be effective in the populations and settings in which they were studied. It is more likely to ensure success from the adoption and/or adaptation of a research-tested intervention program, which has been systematically tested in the field, than to create a new program for the same population delivered in the same setting. When no research-tested intervention programs are available to meet your comprehensive cancer control needs (in terms of populations or settings), then creating a new program may be the best solution. However, in creating the new program it would be wise to consider: • reviewing the available research evidence of similar intervention approaches summarized on Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. Step 3, and • involving local cancer control intervention research experts (see Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T. Step 2 for state and regional contacts who can assist you in identifying researchers in your area) in the design and evaluation of your new

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.