|
Analysts currently predict that SSD will not compete in terms of cost per GB for at least five years. For general capacity being accessed at an average rate, disk is the economical choice -- but for very high-performance applications, solid state can win out. These scenarios are most likely to include Exchange server and database acceleration, and finance operations. In short, if an application needs lots of underutilised (in terms of capacity) disk drives to achieve the required I/O, solid state could be a cost-effective alternative. For SSD to take off more widely in enterprise storage, the price must fall significantly and array vendors will have to optimise their subsystems to work better with solid state. Issues include data in flash drives being accessed in far larger chunks than disk drives, and controllers being a bottleneck when used with SSD because they don't keep up with the performance of the drive. Expert Podcast: While you may know about the advantages of solid-state ...
more
|
Where can solid-state drives be used?
Related Questions
- Hurley: There are multiple threads to its ongoing strategy. First, it is looking to protect and grow its ...
- Asaro: NetApp offers any protocol to its storage, including NFS, CIFS, iSCSI and FC -- which was the smart ...
- Yes, if you connect your Fibre Channel storage to an iSCSI Appliance. These appliances can have internally a ...
- Well yes, it could. It's reassuring, however, that collectively the iSCSI vendors have taken a very ...
- Both iSCSI and Fibre Channel allow for the sharing of block-level data over a network. iSCSI uses a standard ...