Where does WTO/GATT draw the line on what it will do in order to achieve cultural profit?
Unlike corporations, which have absolutely no limits to what they will do in order to bolster their financial profits, WTO/GATT will never promote a project that is likely to result in physical harm to humans. That is WTO/GATT’s only ethical compunction. WTO/GATT also has pragmatic, bottom-line limits – supporting DoS attacks these days might well be counterproductive, destruction of physical property is likely to get one branded a terrorist, and other excessively illegal behaviors are also likely to be problematic – but these are shifting, and can change with the times and laws.
