Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Where was the media regarding terrorism during the Clinton administration?

0
Posted

Where was the media regarding terrorism during the Clinton administration?

0

The news media in many ways is responsible for the fact that many people in the federal government who thought that a Pearl Harbor was going to happen didn’t have enough “media clout” or coverage to get the political momentum to do something about it. Senator Rudman’s report, along with Paul Bremmer’s report, predicted this. They talked about how “nobody in the intelligence community speaks Arabic,” and how “we have all these problems of jurisdiction,” and “we can’t keep track of this stuff.” But nobody read it. The media didn’t report on it. When we did the original documentary, “Hunting bin Laden,” for PBS, no one noticed. It got a couple of reviews. We had people on camera in Muslim communities saying bin Laden is great and Sheik Rahman’s people talking about all this, but no one cared. Q: 15 out of 19 hijackers were Saudi. Has it been determined whether or not the Saudi government was involved in the attack? A: I don’t think that anybody believes that the Saudi government was direc

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.