Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Which is better–civilians or sworn in the comm center?

center civilians COMM sworn
0
Posted

Which is better–civilians or sworn in the comm center?

0

A. There’s no better way to stir up a hornet’s nest than to ask this question! But quite simply, there is no advantage in paying sworn personnel to staff a police or fire communications center. No, their field experience, training or badge-holding status does not make them more qualified than a civilian. However, there is one qualification to this conclusion: a civilian dispatcher must have equivalent or more training than the sworn personnel, must be given the same level of authority to act, and must be properly supervised. A civilian can do the job as good as–and usually better–than a sworn employee, and the pay and benefits will, arguably, be less. Fire and police unions continue to argue otherwise, but–get over it!–civilianization is inevitable.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.