Which theory reflects most accurately the laws of empirical (observable/experiential) science?
It seems that science is based on the presupposition of the harmony, orderliness and predictability of the universe, not time+chance+randomness. We have come up with amazing mathematical formulas based on the orderliness and predictability of the universe! Science heavyweights like Leonardo DaVinci, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur, Francis Bacon, Michael Faraday and Albert Einstein all believed in the Biblical creation account over evolution.[8] Consider cause and effect. The evolutionist would have you believe there was an effect without a cause as life originated from no-life. If a cell has life, it had to come from somewhere. Some would say it came from some ‘primordial soup,’ but where did this come from? And the circle continues. Also, evolution violates the first law of thermo-dynamics which basically says that matter cannot be created or destroyed yet that is exactly what is going on in evolution as energy is being created.[9] The second law of thermodynamics has to do
Related Questions
- How will the CCDC Consistency Review ensure the final built project accurately reflects the concept design and plans shown to the public?
- Is there a recognizable thesis statement that accurately reflects what has been said in the paper?
- Has newtons laws of relativity been replaced by recent string theory?
