Why are the mercury-containing equipment rule and the cathode ray tube rule being finalized separately when they were proposed in one action?
Although they do not address the same materials, the proposed rule to add mercury-containing equipment to the universal waste rule and the proposed rule to exclude cathode ray tubes from the definition of solid waste were published in the same action. To ensure that each rule got finalized as quickly as possible, EPA decided to finalize the two rules separately.
Related Questions
- Why are the mercury-containing equipment rule and the cathode ray tube rule being finalized separately when they were proposed in one action?
- Why were the mercury-containing equipment rule and the cathode ray tube rule finalized separately when they were proposed in one action?
- WHAT is j.j. Thompsons cathode ray tube experiment that discovered the atom?
