Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why did EPA reinstate the Notice of Intent to Comply in the October 2005 final rule?

0
Posted

Why did EPA reinstate the Notice of Intent to Comply in the October 2005 final rule?

0

All Phase II sources (boilers and hydrochloric acid production furnaces) are required to submit a notification of intent to comply (NIC). EPA also required Phase I sources (incinerators, cement kilns, and lightweight aggregate kilns) that need to make upgrades to comply with the final rule standards or that have not previously submitted a NIC, to submit a NIC. The NIC serves as a compliance planning and communication tool. We anticipate that Phase I sources may need to conduct additional upgrades, or in some cases upgrade for the first time, to comply with the replacement standards. We found that re-instituting the NIC for these sources would provide the same planning and communication benefits during the compliance period for the replacement standards that it did for the original Phase I standards. In addition, we believe that the NIC provides the same benefits with respect to communication and compliance strategy planning for the Phase II sources that it has for Phase I sources.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.