|
We don’t believe so. We believe our proposed approach is consistent with encouraging innovation, for the following reasons: • The usage guidelines as proposed do not have a restrictive definition of the formats and protocols with which the icon may be used. In particular, the guidelines do not restrict use of the icon to the present-day RSS or Atom formats; in addition, the guidelines do not rule out the use of protocols other than HTTP to deliver web feeds. • The usage guidelines as proposed do not rule out techniques like using proprietary media types for content items within a web feed published using an open web syndication format. Granted, if taken to an extreme such practices would lessen the usefulness of having open formats, but that’s a question for the broader community to consider in interpreting and evolving the guidelines. • Finally, the guidelines are not legally binding. If you believe that the goal of innovation requires your defining and using partly or completely ...
more
|
Why do the proposed usage guidelines restrict use of the icon to open formats? Won’t that stifle innovation in future applications of web syndication formats?
Related Questions
- MPAA answer: On the contrary, protecting content, broadcast or otherwise, will spur the availability of high ...
- Pre-market approval of an IVD will permit the sponsor to supply products in Australia. The benefits of market ...
- Traditional print newspapers and magazines are experiencing upheaval thanks to the rise of the Internet, but ...
- WfJ welcomes public discussion about the union with all parts of the Pomona Community. WfJ has already ...
- • Personal subscribers to Nature Reviews Drug Discovery can view this article. To do this, associate your ...