A:
1 Answer
rank
1
|
A. In a WLAN (versus a traditional 2G cellular), the co-location of physically adjacent APs on the same channels is not considered a bad deployment or misconfiguration. For a detailed explanation, see the section Understanding Frequency and Transmit Power Planning in the online help or the User Guide for the CiscoWorks Wireless LAN Solution Engine, 2.12.
more
|
cisco.com
Related Videos
Add your answer...
Top Answerers
1.
2.
3.
Top Askers
1.
2.
3.
Top Supporters
1.
2.
3.
Why does a WLSE radio plan recommend the same channel for adjacent APs?
Related Questions
- A. In a WLAN (versus a traditional 2G cellular), the co-location of physically adjacent access points on the ...
- A. Auto assigning incremental names to APs is not possible,but a workaround could be to select Devices > ...
- A. The WLSE must be able to handle situations in which an AP is assigned an address that is already assigned ...
- A. Here is a brief summary of the rogue AP detection logic: a. A rogue AP appears and starts sending out ...
- A. The WLSE must be able to handle situations in which an AP is assigned an address that is already assigned ...