Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

WHY DONT INSURANCE COMPANIES COVER PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, UNLESS FORCED BY REGULATION?

0
Posted

WHY DONT INSURANCE COMPANIES COVER PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, UNLESS FORCED BY REGULATION?

0

is explained by me a little below (within the orange box on the right). Click here to get there. WHAT ARE THE KEY FEATURES OF THE DEMOCRATICALLY SPONSORED BILLS UNDER CONSIDERATION? is explained by me a little below. Click here to get there. WHY IS LEAVING THE HANDLING OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS (Statewise High Risk Pools, Statewise Community Rating, etc.) AS IN ALL REPUBLICAN PLANS A VERY QUESTIONABLE IDEA? is explained by me a little below. Click here to get there. DON’T INSURERS HAVE TO COVER ME, REGARDLESS OF PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS, AS LONG AS I’VE HAD FULL COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH INSURANCE CONTINUOUSLY? NO, in all but the 5 community-rated and modified community-rated states (MA,NY,NJ,ME,VT). In the special case when you are coming off of an employer-based plan, there is a trickily worded false HIPAA protection, that they have to cover you, but “can charge you whatever they want extra due to your pre-existing condition”. (Heck, I’ll cover you for 5 million dollars a year!.) In many

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.