Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not just eliminate gill-nets altogether?

altogether Eliminate
0
Posted

Why not just eliminate gill-nets altogether?

0

First, and most important, increases in SAFE area net pen releases will benefit the sports fishing fleets, as well as commercial fishing. Oregon and Washington coastal communities will see more Chinook and Coho available offshore. The Astoria area and other lower river communities also stand to gain from additional fish processing jobs if netting improves in the SAFE zones. A complete ban on gill-nets would not only hurt local commercial fishermen, but also could hurt sport anglers because much of the support for hatchery production would be lost. Reductions in sport and commercial fishing could also reduce the constituency that supports fish conservation efforts.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.