Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not just use a regular full duplex tap?

DUPLEX regular tap
0
Posted

Why not just use a regular full duplex tap?

0

Traditional full duplex taps provide a dual stream of non-aggregated output – one monitor port for each side of the conversation. This requires use of “dual receive” devices, which have two separate monitor cards and combine the data streams after receiving it. Protocol analyzers, probes, and intrusion detection systems (IDS) of this variety are more expensive and are less common in today’s networks. Many of the most widely used packet sniffer and IDS tools are based, respectively, on the open source Wireshark and Snort products – neither of which supports receiving on separate NICs and recombining the data. The SINGLEstream™ tap can combine the bi-directional traffic from a full duplex conversation into a single data stream, thus allows such tools devices with half duplex single receive monitor cards to be used in-line on full duplex links.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.