Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not Just use Adaptive Equalization on the Receiver?

0
Posted

Why not Just use Adaptive Equalization on the Receiver?

0

From Fourier analysis we know that if we have the correct Amplitude and Phase response of a signal it will be perfectly characterized and can be perfectly recreated. This is true in a system with no noise present. If we were to assume the same Amplitude and Delay corruptions of the signal F above and that these corruptions occurred at the transmitter, then equalization at the receive side will allow the original square waveform to be recreated with one problem. The noise at F will have been increased by 3dB. This occurs because the link noise is added in after the signal was corrupted. Thus, to recreate the frequency spectrum a re-boost at the frequency component of F is done, which also increases the noise at that frequency accordingly. Equalizing at the incorrect point will improve the signal spectrum but will not improve the Signal to Noise ratio; in fact, it will hurt the Signal-to-Noise ratio. The only way to properly optimize link/system performance is to make sure the link/syste

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.