Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not use a “wireless web” architecture for mobility?

0
Posted

Why not use a “wireless web” architecture for mobility?

0

A connection-dependent, browser-based mobile solution is attractive on the surface, since it is technically less complex than store-and-forward. However, this approach is effective only for mobility scenarios with pervasive, high-bandwidth wireless connectivity or without the need for disconnected operation. The reality of field operations and mobile environments is that applications are most effective when they are connection-independent, meaning that they can adapt to the occasionally-available network environment. This adaptive ability to work in any connectivity environment is a core quality of @hand’s technology, and it provides the best solution for most customers.

Related Questions

Thanksgiving questions

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.