Why was Kennedys Long Term Suffering of Venereal Disease Left Out of His Official Autopsy?

0
Posted

Why was Kennedys Long Term Suffering of Venereal Disease Left Out of His Official Autopsy?

0

You and your source are both fraudulent. I am sure you are “unaware”, as you undoubtedly claimed to be when you ran similar ignorant filth under another fake i.d., that by 1963, antibiotics already existed in numbers which could easily deal with ANY venereal disease of the times. And apparently, in your demented state, you expect rational people to believe this insane lie. However, trust us, Kennedy could surely afford treatment. Moreover, such a condition would not even have been tested for in an autopsy. In addition to your MANY other errors of inexcusable and disgusting unawareness, someone–probably whatever foul-mouthed imbecile gave you this mad disinformation–did not tell you that the sole purpose of such an examination is to determine cause of death, and there would have been no doubt what that cause was. Is this deranged rant–AND IT IS A RANT AND IT IS DERANGED!!–another one of these fascist conspiracy theories you’re trying to sell someone to make another dishonest buck? W

0

LOL He wouldn’t be the first. Didn’t Hitler have syphilis ? Edit: Wow, I am reading your article with complete disbelief. Hold on…this is as gripping as a suspense novel….will comment shortly. Double Edit: AH-HA! It’s Time Magazine B.S., paraphrasing a hair-raising portrayal of the Kennedy family. Can you post the paragraph mentioning an STD? I didn’t get to it because it felt like reading a tabloid. Here: “Even that eyebrow-raising first chapter is a tease. If those dirty files exist, Hersh didn’t get them. Don’t look here either for a nuanced portrait of Kennedy’s presidency.” P.S. I’m not a Democrat. Thanks for showing me that Time Magazine cannot always be trusted to be upfront about any story.

Related Questions