Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why was the plum pudding model for atoms doubted?

atoms doubted model Plum pudding
0
Posted

Why was the plum pudding model for atoms doubted?

0

Thomson’s raisin bun model of the atom, where electrons are embedded in a blob of massless positive charge, was invalidated by the gold foil experiment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger-Marsden_experiment). Alpha particles (i.e., helium nuclei: two protons and two neutrons) fired at gold foil were expected to pass through unobstructed under Thomson’s model, but occasionally deflected back at an extremely sharp angle — some essentially doubled back at a 180 degree angle. This suggested that the positive charge of the gold foil’s atoms was concentrated in a tiny mass at the centre of the atom, producing a large repulsive electric force on the (rare) occasions that the positively-charged alpha particles closely approached the proton-containing nuclei of the foil’s atoms.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.