Why would the panel comments for an IGERT preliminary proposal and the invited full proposal be different?
The panels for preliminary and full proposals differ in their interdisciplinarity (the full proposal panel is obviously more so than the preliminary proposal panel) and as IGERT does not have standing panels the personnel differs each time. Everyone brings a somewhat different perspective to the panels.
Related Questions
- When proposing partnerships with other institutions in an IGERT preliminary proposal, where should the sub-awards be mentioned if there are no budget pages at that stage?
- How are IGERT preliminary and full proposals reviewed, and is it different for each stage?
- Can a PI call the IGERT Program Directors to discuss their panel review comments?
Why would the panel comments for an IGERT preliminary proposal and the invited full proposal be different?