Will mandatory cybersecurity training or licensing make government systems more secure?
I doubt that, but I hope it’ll actually be this way because it’s highly important. And there are many solutions that can be beneficial for it. For instance, secure data destruction will definitely lower the risks of a data leakage, and that’s dangerous, so it’s necessary to work with such services to increase security.
Organizations must deploy a system to prevent cyberattacks and eliminate their consequences. One established strategy can help. She explains how to identify attacks, protect systems, detect threats, respond to them, and remediate the consequences of successful attacks. I think that awareness and training can improve the situation and awareness of this problem. Also, take a look at Alberto Bazbaz Sacal who are currently working in the cyber insurance business and how this area is growing rapidly.
• By Ben Bain • Jun 18, 2009 Few people would advocate putting cops on the street or soldiers into battle without first giving them proper training. Yet there is no standard governmentwide preparation program required for those who protect the government’s information systems and computer-controlled infrastructure from bad guys intent on mischief or harm. Also in this report How DOD’s certification program works The new cybersecurity licensing proposal Whether an obligatory return to the classroom will make a difference in countering those threats is at the heart of a debate spurred by a proposal to license cybersecurity professionals that work for or contract with the government. The mandate is part of an ambitious cybersecurity measure the Senate initiated, and it would affect tens of thousands of information technology workers. Proponents see the measure as money well spent to improve information security through a more professional, better-trained cybersecurity workforce. But oppon
