Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

You’re starting with water electrolysis. Isn’t that very inefficient and extremely expensive?

April 26, 2017electrolysis expensive EXTREMELY inefficient isn’t water

0

Posted

You’re starting with water electrolysis. Isn’t that very inefficient and extremely expensive?

2 Answers

0

Posted

Commercially available electrolyzers have achieved 73% efficiency for the past 7 years, and laboratory experiments have exceeded 94% efficiency. Yes, they’ve been expensive, but the DOE projects their price will drop by a factor of six over the next decade and efficiencies will steadily improve. Read more.

0

Posted

Commercially available electrolyzers have achieved 84% efficiency, and laboratory experiments have exceeded 94% efficiency. Yes, they’ve been expensive, but the DOE projects their price will drop by a factor of six over the next decade and efficiencies will steadily improve. Read more.