Definitions Are biometrics inherently privacy-invasive or privacy-protective?
Biometrics, like any technology, are defined by their usage. The broad range of biometric technologies, infrastructures, and deployment environments render any all-encompassing statements on biometrics pointless. Biometrics can be deployed in a privacy-invasive fashion, in a privacy-neutral fashion, and in a privacy-protective fashion. An analogy to databases is instructive. Databases can be used to link personal information from disparate sources without user consent and are the source of much of the privacy world s concern about information aggregation and misuse. Are databases inherently privacy-invasive? No. It is the specific use to which they are put, and the systemic and operational controls (or lack thereof) which define whether databases are privacy-invasive. The same can be said for biometric technologies.
- Isn somafera just a particularly aggressive display of uncontrolled temper and rage? Is it not therefore inherently weaker than a controlled, disciplined practice?
- Definitions Are biometrics inherently privacy-invasive or privacy-protective?
- Is the idea of the incarnation of God inherently mythological?